|
![[ about ]](../../../../images/buttons/babout.gif)

![[ concerts ]](../../../../images/buttons/bconcert.gif)

![[ recordings ]](../../../../images/buttons/brecordi.gif)

![[ royal court ]](../../../../images/buttons/broyalco.gif)

![[ online ]](../../../../images/buttons/bonline.gif)
|
 
Publication: Village Voice [US]
Date: December 10, 1996
Section:
Page Number(s):
Length:
Title: "Glyph Notes"
Reviewed By: Daisann McLane
*Emancipation* -- the title of the new album from The Artist
Formerly Known as Prince (whom I shall henceforth, in the interests of
readability, refer to by birth name only) -- is a word heavy with
meanings, and Prince means them all. Earlier this month, when he
debuted his 36-song, three-hour-long triple CD for press, friends, and
his new wife (he's married now, and a dad, though the health of his
baby is the subject of speculation), he opened by playing a recording
of Martin Luther King's "free at last ... free at last" oration. At
first this seems like a grandiose gesture from a musician celebrating
his freedom from the oppression of a $100 million contract with Warner
Bros. A George Clinton might've pulled off this play by squeezing the
last drop of high-ironic juice from the juxtaposition. But irony,
especially the self-reflective kind, has never been a Princely
quality. We're asked to buy Prince's emancipations -- economic,
emotional, physical, sexual, and artistic -- at face value, as a
package deal (albeit at a discounted price of $25.99). The question
is, should we?
One of the truisms of pop music is the incompatibility of
artistic freedom with the machinery of the marketplace. The old saw
goes that the Artist needs to be set loose in the playground to pursue
his or her own unique vision, free from the fetters of the Company.
It's a high-modernist view of artistry that's faded from fashion in
other spheres, but it's still accepted in the music business despite
all evidence that freedom gets you at least two George Michaels for
every Springsteen. What's more, the Artist myth obscures the reality
that much of the greatest pop's been crafted by anonymous, often
exploitative, hit factories from the Brill Building to Studio One.
Though the latest press release on Prince would have you
believing that the issue of artistic freedom and total control
materialized over the last four years of his frustrated relationship
with Warner's, that's not so. control was a front-and-center there in
Prince's career right from the get-go in 1978 -- why else make your
debut LP (For You) a one-man-band affair if not to make sure you are
the one calling all the shots? For a black musician trying to bust
open pop's segregated genres and playlists, the control-freedom thing
took on even greater resonance. Yet, paradoxically, by claiming pop's
whites-only modernist myth for blacks, Prince distanced himself from
other black musicians still working the home turf where community and
collaboration are aesthetic priorities.
His 1984 and 1990 movie musicals, Purple Rain and Graffiti
Bridge, illustrate -- cartoonishly -- the racial and cultural tensions
of Prince's position. In both films Prince's character, the Kid, has
to hold forth against the subversive plots of the jive-talking,
vaudeville-circuit figure of Morris Day, whose groove-machine band,
the Time, threatens to wipe the Kid's less commercial rock-funk off
the map. Day, the quintessential party down crowd pleaser, just wants
to have fun, and he, not the Kid, is the people's choice. "Nobody's
ever gonna appreciate my music," the Kid laments in Graffiti Bridge.
Of course, by the end of the film, the public has come around to
Prince's side -- it's his movie, after all -- and both films close
with triumphant performances, tours de four as passionate as they are
personal.
Real life didn't turn out like the movies. In 1984, the Purple
Rain soundtrack sold 13 million copies, and soon after, Greg Tate
saluted Prince for "securing the black rock revival." Though it's
true that Prince's mega-success paved a path for black rock artists
from Living Color to Me'shell N'dgeOcello, when it came time to write
the book on black-white crossover pop in the '90s, Prince wasn't at
the keyboard. Nor was it his trademark sound, the Sly-Hendrix-cum-Van
Halen funk and metal, that persisted as the groove to conquer.
Instead, Prince got nudged from the vanguard by hiphop, a music that
in its embrace of postmodern techniques like sampling, its insistence
on authenticity and populism, and its exaggerated masculinity was just
about the antithesis of everything that Prince, the pop modernist,
stood for.
Meanwhile, Prince, self-isolated in his Minnesota playground,
Paisley Park, continued to turn out music that was at worst good and
at best brilliant -- but never as galvanizing or of the moment as his
breakthrough albums of the early '80s. Finally, he resorted to parody
of the genre that had rushed to fill the space that he had opened, on
The Black Album. His sales sagged, his feud with Warner's escalated,
and he turned his name into a glyph. Now he's free at last -- at
least on the business side. In his new deal, Prince makes the music,
packages it, and then *pays* EMI to manufacture and distribute it.
The total control, though, comes at a price, for if Prince stiffs at
the box office he stands to drop a bundle.
Well, I'm rooting for the happy ending. Emancipation is a
sprawling and at times self-indulgent work that probably could have
been trimmed to a double CD. That's the obvious thing to say, and
most of the critics have said it -- but then when they suggest what
cuts should stay, not one comes up with the same list. I'm not
surprised. Emancipation is a fully stocked candy store: too much, but
oh so luscious and you want to try everything. Songs begin in one key
and tempo, then suddenly a shimmering bridge slips in out of nowhere,
or there's a sharp right turn into a whole different genre. From slow
groove, funk, swing, jump, techno, cha-cha, psychedelic, and
mainstream rock to, yes, even hiphop, Prince lays them all down,
reminding us that he's probably the only American musician alive who
can do this all so well.
Although Emancipation's breadth may overwhelm, there is a
structure to it. CD number one has a party jam-midtempo feel; number
two drifts off into Quiet Storm land as Prince meditates on his
favorite recurring motifs, sex and redemption; number three gets more
contemporary, with samples, rap, and techno beats used to cast a dark,
ominous mood. As you'd expect from this modernist holdout, the
Artist's personal preoccupations are central. It's all about his
emancipation: from corporations and adversaries (the explosive "Face
Down" with its "Dead like Elvis" sample), and from empty relationships
(in "The Holy River," 38-year-old Prince finally discovers the joys of
monogamy).
Emancipation treads dangerously close to the banal and
solipsistic but never trips over the edge, because in celebrating his
newfound personal freedoms, Prince is getting off so good that it
gushes out of the speakers. Interestingly, the musical era that
Prince quotes more often than any other is the black music of the late
'60s and '70s, a time when black pop musicians, liberated from the
commercial strictures of the three minute single, stretched out to
meditate, politicize, prophesy, and sexualize on "concept" LPs.
Echoes of Sly's "Family Affair," the Isley Brothers' "Fight the
Power," the O'Jays', and Curtis Mayfield lurk in almost every track on
the first of Emancipation's CDs; the sex and romanticism of Marvin
Gaye and Gamble-Huff get their due implicitly in Prince's jaw-dropping
displays of falsetto, and explicitly with covers of Thom Bell classics
"Betcha By Golly Wow" and "La La La (Means I Love You)."
Black music of the '70s was both utopian and romantic, and
certainly, in hindsight, overly optimistic. Anybody who hung out in
Philadelphia during the Gamble-Huff days couldn't help but notice the
disjuncture between the lush universe of the Philly sound and what was
going on in the neighborhood. Still, there were healing and
transcendence coming out of those hermetically sealed worlds of those
studios, and Prince's Emancipation brings that back not only as
nostalgia, but as an alternative for an audience that isn't old enough
to remember the first go-round.
Whether Prince has stumbled onto the next period revival trend
remains to be seen. All I know is that against the current pop
background of grunge angst, hiphop posturing, and general despair and
cynicism, the pleasure Prince communicates practically feels
revolutionary. It's part of his emancipation that doesn't belong only
to him, that's beyond his control. It's the part everybody can share.
|